Chapter 10. Sexual Selection
-
Sexual dimorphism is common in many animal species (and a few plant species),
includes differences in
-
size
-
coloration
-
mating behaviors
-
Can natural selection explain sexual dimorphism?
-
Some traits (e.g. bright feathers) would seem to reduce fitness.
-
Darwin's solution: if there is heritable variation in traits affecting
mating success, traits conducive to success will become more common. This
is sexual selection. (Note: sexual selection is not the same thing
as mate selection, although the latter can result in the former.)
-
Asymmetries in sexual reproduction are common, especially with regard to
parental investment which is
-
Typically high in females, includes expense of eggs, incubation, gestation,
defense of young, etc.
-
Typically low in males. Sperms are cheap, there is rarely any paternal
care of young.
-
What limits reproductive success in females and males?
-
Females: limited by number of eggs that can be produced or pregnancies
that can be carried. This leads to the prediction that females should
be "choosy", resulting in intersexual selection.
-
Males: limited by number of females he can mate with. This leads
to the prediction the males should be "competitive", resulting in intrasexual
selection.
-
Rough skinned newt (Figure 10.5) - results of investigation confirm predictions,
males more limited by access to mate than females
-
Broad-nosed pipefish (Figure 10.5) - an example of sex role reversal, in
this case females are more limited by access to mates.
-
Male-male competition resulting in intrasexual selection.
-
Combat. Example: marine iguanas (large males monopolize females).
See Figures 10.7-10.10, Table 10.1
-
Sperm competition. Many insect examples (to counter multiple copulations,
tactics include producing more sperm, inserting plug, cleaning out competitors'
sperm)
-
Infanticide. Example: Lions (males kill unrelated young)
-
Female choice resulting in intrasexual selection.
-
Do females really make choices based on male traits? Example: female
barn swallows prefer males with long feathers. See Figures 10.16-17,
Table 10.2
-
How do females benefit from appropriate choices?
-
Access to more resources
-
Fathers with good genes produce more fit offspring. Example: tree
frogs, Figures 10.20-21, Table 10.3.
-
"Sexy son" hypothesis.
-
What abut humans?
-
Yanomamo (Amazonia) - killers father more children. Figure 10.33.
-
Polish men - tall men are more likely to marry than short men, tall fathers
have more children than short fathers. Figure 10.34.
-
Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology - beware!