Topics

    The following was written in a previous semester.  The material covered in a lecture this semester may not be identical to that covered on a specific day last semester, but taken as a whole these lecture notes cover the same material that is covered this semester.
 

Wednesday, April  9

    Today we discussed chapter 13.  The first part of the chapter deals with the origin and dispersal of modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens).  There are three major models concerning the origin of modern humans.
1.  The Complete Replacement (Out of Africa) model.  This model states that modern humans evolved first in Africa and then spread out and replaced populations of archaic Homo sapiens elsewhere.  In other words, this model suggests a speciation event.  If this were the case, then we should be calling archaic Homo sapiens something else, because they were not members of our species.  Two lines of evidence support this model.  First, there are modern looking skulls from Klasies River Mouth and Border Cave in South Africa which date to between 120,000 - 100,000 years ago.  Second, studies of mitochondrial DNA of women around the world suggest that we all have a common ancestor around 200,000 years ago. This is also known as the "Eve" hypothesis.  Studies of the Y chromosome complement this view, since there is not a lot of variability in the DNA of the Y chromosome.
2. The Partial Replacement Model.  This says that modern humans evolved first in Africa and then spread out.  In some cases they may have replaced existing populations (as in 1 above), but in other cases these modern people may have mated with individuals in the native populations (hybridization).  This would mean that there are genes from archaic Homo sapiens populations, possibly including some Neandertals, in the modern gene pool.
3.  The Regional Continuity (Multiregional Evolution) Model.  This model argues that different populations of archaic Homo sapiens gradually evolved into modern humans, Homo sapiens sapiens.  With this model, there would have to be gene flow (mating) between populations.  Analysis of skeletal material from China supports this idea, especially the persistence of shovel shaped incisors over a long period of time. 
Pages 321-328 present evidence relating to the above three models.  Look these pages over but don't get bogged or try to remember too many details in these pages.  You do not need to remember all the illustrative material.


    The second part of the chapter concerns technology and art in the Upper Paleolithic.  The Upper Paleolithic (35,000 - 10,000 B.P. (B.P. = before present) is the cultural period associated with modern humans in Europe.  Don't worry about the names of specific Upper Paleolithic cultures (Solutrean, Aurignacian, etc.).  We focus on Europe because we have the most evidence from that part of the world.  Upper Paleolithic stone tools included blades (long thin flakes) and burins (chisels).  Well made bifacially (bifacial = flakes removed from both faces or sides) worked stone tools were manufactured by pressure flaking.  Bone tools are found in the Upper Paleolithic and include awls, needles, pins, fishhooks, harpoons, hoes, and shovels.  Upper Paleolithic people had the spear thrower (atlatl) and the bow and arrow.  This enabled them to kill animals without getting right up next to the animal, the way Neandertals probably did.  The Upper Paleolithic is also famous for visual and material imagery, what is usually called "art".  In addition to jewelry, we see female and animal figurines and cave paintings.  There are many interpretations regarding the meaning of the figurines and paintings.  Two common interpretations of cave paintings involve: 1) hunting magic, and 2) ritual space.
.
 

Friday,  April 11

          No class today.  Prof. Engelbrecht is at a professional meeting.

 

Monday, April 14

    We discussed chapter 14, "Understanding the Past: Archaeological Approaches".   Archaeologists do both survey and excavation.  To illustrate archaeological excavation, I showed slides of my own work.  Archaeologists study artifacts, features, and ecofacts.  Features are non-portable evidence of human activity.  A hearth would be an example of a feature.  Ecofacts refer to plant and animal remains.  Some ecofacts are recovered by flotation, a water separation technique.  Of particular interest is the context in which an artifact, feature, or ecofact is found. Archaeologists record the location or provenience of material on a site and can later determine that location by examining a catalog number on the material. In a well organized archaeological collection, the researcher should be able to determine not only where something was found on a site, but what was found with it.

    Ethnoarchaeology, ethnographic analogy, and experimental archaeology are other approaches to understanding the past.  The manufacture of stone tools is one type of experimental archaeology that is very popular.  Flint knappers are experimenters who flake stone tools. 

     In chapter 9 we talked about relative techniques of dating (stratigraphy) and chronometric forms of dating (Potassium-argon).  Chapter 14 expands this discussion.  Radiocarbon dating is a chronometric technqiue based on the decay of  14 C.  The half life of this isotope is 5,730 years.  Thus, organic material that is that old will have only half the radiocarbon that living material has.  The upper limit of this method is about 70,000 years, so radiocarbon cannot be used to date early hominid remains.  Dendrochronology or tree ring dating is used where wood is preserved and where a distinctive pattern of tree ring growth can be determined.

 

Wednesday, April 16

         We did a typology exercise.  Some students felt that there were many types represented in the sample provided.  They are "splitters".  Others thought only a few types were represented.  They are "lumpers".  The important point is not the number of types, but the fact that types are abstractions from reality.

    There is a lot of other material discussed in chapter 14.  Don't worry about it.  Just know the material mentioned above.

    We discussed the first part (pp.373-388) of Chapter 15, Holocene Hunters and Gatherers.  Around 30,000 years ago during the Pleistocene, Siberia and Northeastern Asia were inhabited by modern humans who were culturally adapted to survive in a cold, harsh environment.  During periods of glaciation, the Bering Strait which separates northeastern Asia from Alaska was dry land, an area called Beringia.  Sometime between 25,000 and 12,000 years ago northern hunter-gatherer peoples must have crossed from Asia to the Americas.  It is generally thought that they traveled on land, but it is possible that they traveled along the coast in boats.  During periods of lowered sea level during the Pleistocene, western Alaska was really a part of Siberia.  During periods of maximum glaciation (the Wisconsin glaciation in North America), the way south was probably blocked by ice.  In warmer times there was an ice free corridor, though how possible it would have been to travel south along this corridor is debated.  In class, I suggested that it is more probable that people moved south along the coast. In the Americas at this time were some large animals, referred to collectively as Pleistocene megafauna.  These included mammoth, long horned bison, and giant ground sloth.

    There is evidence from the site of Monte Verde in southern Chile that people were that far south in the Americas by 13,000 years ago.  Closer to home, Meadowcroft Rock Shelter in southwest Pennsylvania is a site occupied by early Americans at least by 14,000 years ago.  Though the dating of both Monte Verde and Meadowcroft have been questioned, the majority of investigators now accept these sites as evidence for people in the Americas prior to the well known Paleoindians.

    Paleoindian cultures are considered to be early Holocene in age. We discussed three Paleoindian cultures in class: Clovis, Folsom, and Plano.  Large, bifacially worked Clovis points have been found embedded in mammoth bones. Clovis points on a site are often made from a variety of stone material, suggesting that these hunters traveled widely.  It seems probable that they exploited a large hunting territory.


     Folsom points have been found embedded in the bones of long horned bison.  Some of these animals may have been stampeded over cliffs or trapped in canyons.  Plano sites show an increased use of plants.  It also appears that population is increasing at this time. This is the same time that Pleistocene megafauna is dying out.  A current debate revolves around the role of Paleoindians in these extinctions.  The environment was also changing as the glaciers moved north.

 

Friday,  April 18


    We continued with Chapter 15.  Note that you are not responsible for the entire chapter (see syllabus).

    Trends characteristic of the following Mesolithic period in Europe (Archaic in North America) include population increase, decrease in size of the range of individual groups, increase in sedentism, increase in cultural diversity, and increase in trade/exchange.

   The Mesolithic period culture known as the Natufian is located in the Near East.  During the early Holocene, the area where wild cereal grasses grew expanded to include areas of nut trees.  Instead of moving from lowland stands of wild wheat and barley to upland nut resources, Natufians were able to stay in one spot and harvest both kinds of resources.  Exploitation of these resources is revealed through flotation, a water separation recovery technique discussed earlier.  The presence of pit houses, cemeteries, and grinding stones all point to sedentism.  Mesolithic adaptations like that of the Natufians help us understand the early stages of farming.  In this part of the Near East it is clear that sedentary villages came before farming villages.  In some other areas, the spread of farming enabled populations to become sedentary.

      Chapter 16 deals with the development of farming.  It is important to know that the term "Neolithic" refers to farming. The "Neolithic Revolution" had important consequences which we will go over next time.  The domestication of plants and animals was an evolutionary process, not a one time event.  It occurred in many different areas of the world but we will only focus on this process in the Near East and Mesoamerica.  The term horticulture in this course refers to farmers who used hand tools, not plows.  Many early farmers were probably women, while men continued to hunt.  A cultigen is a plant that is dependent on humans for propagation.  In class, I used corn, a New World cultigen, as an example.

    We can generally recognize domesticated seeds by an increase in size, restriction of seed dispersal mechanisms, and loss of husks and other protective devices.  Animal domesticates can be recognized by changed skeletal structure (sheep lose their horns), change in size (cattle get smaller), or changed demography (increased number of immature males slaughtered).  A change in the geographical distribution of both plants and animals often signals domestication.
 
 

Monday,  April 21

    Farming started independently in a number of different areas.  We just have time to look at the development of farming in the Middle East and Mesoamerica.

    We do not know exactly why people started farming.  One idea is that with settled village life, population increased and people needed to get more food from the area in which they lived.  In the Near East, cereal grains provided "second choice" alternatives to meat and fruit.  Cereal grains could also be stored and eaten during periods when resources were scarce.  Wild stands of cereal grains may have been expanded and protected, or artificially reproduced in fields.  Bt 7,000 B.C., Neolithic farmers in the Middle East were growing wheat and barley and had domesticated sheep and goats.

    We saw a number of slides of the Neolithic sites of Jericho (Israel) and Catal Huyuk (Turkey).  These were relatively large Neolithic sites.  Other Neolithic sites were smaller.  Farming gradually diffused from the Middle East into Europe.  It took a long time, because plants adapted to long, hot, dry summers do not do well in areas like northern Europe characterized by short, wet cool summers.  New varieties of these crops were selected for.  Neolithic farmers in Europe left behind megaliths, large stones used for constructing communal graves or circles.  Stonehenge is a famous megalithic monument in Great Britain which was started in the Neolithic period.


     We took a quick look at the development of farming in MexicoMaize (corn). beans, and squash were the most important domesticates.  Early corn was not very productive.  Kernels were small and looked more like grass seed.  It took Mesoamerican (Mexican) farmers thousands of years to develop more productive strains.  Corn, beans, and squash  diffused (spread) both to North America and to Central and South America.

 

Wednesday,  April 23

     The big advantage of farming is that it is capable of feeding more people than hunting and gathering.   Farming made village life common, but it did not necessarily create more leisure time or better health.

    With sedentary life, ceramic vessels, especially cooking pots, become common.  These were needed to boil cereal grains.  Weaving wool or plant fibers on a loom became common.  Surplus production might be exchanged or redistributed, and some non-farming specialists like priests, merchants, craftsmen and administrators might have been found in the larger Neolithic towns.  Continued farming of the same plots of land probably led to the idea of land ownership.

    Farming had some negative environmental consequences.  These include deforestation, soil erosion, depletion of soil nutrients, salinization (with later irrigation), and overgrazing.  Crop pests multiplied as did weeds. In tropical areas, stagnant pools of water become breeding grounds for mosquitoes which spread malaria.  Only a few species are domesticated, and the changed ecosystems often result in the extinction of many species, resulting in diminished biodiversity.  Domesticated species tend to become genetically homogeneous, rendering them susceptible to disease, drought , and pests.

    Despite the above, farming expanded at the expense of hunting and gathering.  In the last century, hunters and gatherers were found only in environments in which farming was not possible (too cold, too dry).  While all people have some manner of spiritual beliefs, farmers tend to be concerned with farming and have rituals to ensure crop success as well as thanksgiving for a harvest.  Neolithic societies often have religious structures in which community rituals probably took place.

    In general, pre-agricultural diets were low in saturated fat and salt, but high in complex carbohydrates, animal protein and fiber.  The capacity to store fat was probably advantageous to our distant hunting and gathering ancestors, but today this poses a health risk for many people in the world who lead a sedentary life style and have a fat-rich diet.

    Farming populations generally have more dental caries as a result of a starchy diet.  Those populations in close association with domestic animals were at risk for zoonoses - diseases transmitted to humans from vertebrates.  Examples of such diseases include rabies, tetanus, influenza (swine flu), T.B., and AIDS, the latter probably from people who ate chimp meat (bush meat) infected with a chimp version of the disease.  Some diseases require a large population if the virus or bacterium is to survive (measles, smallpox) as it needs always to be infecting a new host.

    At best, farming has been of mixed benefit to humans, but it enables many more of us to be alive today.  Human population continues to increase at an alarming rate.  Ultimately, this is a consequence of the Neolithic Revolution

    We then began a look at civilization, the subject of chapter 17.  By civilization we mean a complex society, one with a number of characteristics which differentiates it from Neolithic societies.  One of these characteristics of civilization is agricultural intensification.  Examples of this include irrigation, use of a plow, and used of raised fields (fertile plots built up out of the water).  These require more effort, but result in greater agricultural returns.

    In addition to agricultural intensification, civilization is often marked by cities (urbanism).  Cities are large, dense population centers, but they have additional characteristics.  Many non-agricultural activities occur in cities, and cities are marked by economic interdependence.  One cannot be self sufficient and live in a city.  There are formal organizations within cities as well as impersonal contacts.  You do not necessarily know everyone you come into contact with in a city.
 

Friday, April 25

    Civilizations are also marked by a diversification of labor (true division of labor).  Many ancient Old World civilizations are termed "Bronze Age".  Bronze is an alloy (mixture) of copper and tin.  First the ores had to be mined, then the ore smelted.  Copper and tin ores are not necessarily found near one another, so ingots of each metal have to be brought together.  Then a craftsmen has to heat them to a high temperature in order to fashion a bronze artifact.  All of this requires labor specialization.

    Civilizations are also marked by a state level organization (central government).  Governments must provide for the common defense, raise taxes (often in the form of labor service or agricultural products), and maintain internal order.  City planning is evident in many early urban centers, as are monumental public works like pyramids and walls.  Forms of record keeping (including writing) arose to facilitate economic and organizational needs.  Writing is also important because it transcends time and space and allows for the accumulation of knowledge.

    It is commonly assumed that most hunters and gatherers and Neolithic farmers were egalitarian.  That is, they were essentially equal in terms of access to resources.  With civilization we see the development of inequalities.  Civilizations are marked by social stratification.  Evidence of this is apparent from burials, dwelling size, and written documents.

    Factors suggested as important in the development of civilizations include irrigation systems, trade networks, environmental and social circumscription, and religion.  Today, most investigators link these factors in a systems approach.  This is a multivariate approach, meaning that more than one factor or variable is involved.  A simplified multivariate explanation provided by our text suggests that intensive agricultural practices led to the production of a surplus.  This surplus was then manipulated by managers or spiritual leaders in various ways which promoted trade, social and economic stratification, true division of labor, and population growth.
 
 

Monday, April 28

    The world's first civilization was known as SumerSumer was located in what is now Iraq between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, a geographic region known as MesopotamiaMesopotamia was colonized by Neolithic farmers around 5500 B.C.  Farming had been practiced for at least 2000 years to the north in the uplands. However, it was not until the development of irrigation that this region could be farmed.  Ubaid farmers grew barley, wheat, and date palms, and had domesticated pigs, sheep, donkeys and cattle.  In the center of Ubaid villages was a small religious structure or shrine.  Copper, obsidian, and various semi-precious stones have been found in Ubaid sites indicating trade.  There is no stone in the alluvial plains of Mesopotamia.  By 3500 B.C. Ubaid villages had grown into large towns and large scale irrigation networks were being developed, along with drainage of wetlands.

    The date for the beginning of Sumerian civilization is somewhat arbitrary.  Our text takes 3,000 B.C. as the start.  By this time, the city of Uruk may have had as many as 50,000 people.  It is sometimes referred to as the world's first city.  It was dominated by two massive temple complexes.  Clay tablets with early record keeping have been found adjacent to these temple complexes.  They are largely concerned with recording economic transactions.  Temples served as places of food storage and distribution.  Temple personnel also organized long distance trading expeditions.  Many craftsmen were associated with the temple.  In short, it served as the central economic institution in early Sumerian cities.  The actual temple pyramid of baked mud brick is known as a ziggurat.

    Sumer consisted of at least 12 city states each ruled by a king.  These city states frequently fought with one another.  Individuals captured in battle often became slaves.  Royal tombs were found at Ur which contained lavish burial offerings and sacrificed members of the royal court.  This is a striking reminder of the social differences that existed in these early civilizations.  In  2334 B.C., Sargon unifies all the city states into an empire.

     Bronze metallurgy, wheeled carts, draft animals, the plow, and sailing boats all are found in Sumer.  The later Babylonian Code of Hammurabi had its roots in Sumerian written law. Many accounts in the Old Testament (the story of Job, the flood) are found on Sumerian and later Babylonian clay tablets.  Sumerians used a number system to the base 6, and traces of this system survive in our use of a dozen, 24 hours in a day, 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 360 degrees in a circle.

      Irrigation in Sumer caused salt deposits to form.  Today, the land in southern Mesopotamia is not as productive as it was in the past. Negative impacts on the ecosystem are a continuing problem for civilizations today.

 

Wednesday,  April 30

     This class was a review of material since the last exam.  We have covered three basic ways of life: hunting and gathering, farming (the Neolithic), and civilization (complex society). Hunters and gatherers included Upper Paleolithic peoples of Europe and Paleoindians of North America.  Natufian hunters and gatherers in the Middle East focused on cereal grains which were later domesticated by Neolithic peoples in the region.  In general, hunters and gatherers are characterized by a low population density and group size of around 25.  Farmers have a higher population density and may live in farming villages of hundreds of people.  The highest population densities are achieved by civilizations with people living in cities of 40,000 or more inhabitants.  Such urban centers require an efficient system of food production and transportation.  While hunter-gatherers and farmers are largely self sufficient, people living in cities are not.  People in cities generally have different occupations.  One does not see much labor specialization in Neolithic times.  Hunter-gatherer and Neolithic societies are egalitarian, while civilizations typically have social classes.  All peoples have religious or spiritual beliefs and religion may mark life transitions (rites of passage) and may be used in curing ceremonies.  While hunters bring spiritual beliefs to the hunt, farmers bring spiritual beliefs to the planting and harvesting of crops.  In civilization, religious beliefs often focus on interpersonal relationships and morality.  Just as farming changed human's relationship with nature, so life in cities changed interpersonal relationships.  Many religions associated with great civilizations have something like the "golden rule": "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

______________________________

The following is not covered Spring 2003

    Today we looked at the civilizations which developed in Mesoamerica (also known as Central America).  These are covered in the first part of Chapter 18 which you are not required to read.  This region has both highland and lowland areas, and civilizations are found in both geographical settings.  The first complex society or civilization in Mesoamerica was the Olmec, located in the Gulf Coast lowlands.  This developed around 1500 B.C.  Slightly later, the Maya civilization developed to the east in the Yucatan Penninsula.  We saw slides of two Classic Period (AD 250-850) Maya sites: Tikal and Palenque.  Most Maya centers were abandoned at the end of the Classic Period.  It is possible that there were too many people for the region to sustain for a long period of time.  In the highlands, the Classic period site of Teotihuacan may have consisted of more than 100,000 people.  It has a broad avenue indicated city planning.

 
    In the Postclassic Period (AD 850 - contact) Maya sites in the north of the Yucatan Peninsula like Chichen Itza showed similarities with contemporary Toltec sites far to the north in the Highlands. The Aztec were the last major
Mesoamerica civilization to be discussed.  The Aztec capital, Tenochtitlan, consisted of perhaps 300,000 people and is the site of Mexico City today.  The Aztec were conquered by the Spanish, but it was European diseases which took the greatest toll on Native peoples.

 
    We can see a number of trends in Mesoamerican civilization.  First religious centers appear which gradually develop into urban centers.  Power is concentrated in urban centers. Trade becomes increasingly important over time and we see the development of separate merchant groups.  Over time, there is increasing social and economic differentiation (more different kinds of jobs, more status differences).  Militarism increases, and kin based and sacred sanctions are replaced by military force.