Je G

I-Search Paper

English 309W

May 6, 2004

 

 

The I-Search Paper: How Effective is it?

 

Introduction

            Prior to this semester, I had never heard of an I-Search paper.  I have been in school for several years, and I have never had the opportunity to do anything other than a traditional research paper.  In many cases, I would get to select my topic to write on, but there were always some prescribed guidelines.  Also, using the first person, I, was strongly discouraged.  When Dr. Wahlstrom introduced the I-Search assignment, I must admit I was still confused.  I decided to write my I-Search paper for English 309W on using I-Search papers in the classroom. 

            Using the first person is almost uncomfortable for me, since it’s something that has been drilled into me not to do.  As a future social studies teacher, I would like to have different types of writing assignments for my students.  The I-Search seems ideal since from the little I know, it’s student centered, meaning the students get to choose their research question and it combines this with the important skill of learning how to conduct research.  The social studies standards require that social studies teachers teach their students to research and problem solve.  If the I-Search paper is a different way to do, while getting students interested and active, then it seems like something I should know about.  I wanted to know about the I-Search process, how it is used in middle and high schools, and what kinds of results teachers and students are getting from using the I-Search paper in their classes.

The Hunt

            I began my research by searching the ERIC on line database for I-Search.  I located several educational articles and studies, but I was not able to access as many as I wanted.  Several of the articles were in journals the Buffalo State College library does not subscribe to and journal articles are not available as ERIC documents on microfiche.   I was able to look at 2 books and an article on ERIC microfiche.  This was a learning experience in and of itself.  I heard about the ERIC database for education information, but had not used it until I started on this I-Search project.  Also, I had not used microfiche at Buffalo State, so that was another valuable learning experience.

            The ERIC documents I looked at included an article by Tom Reigstad in which he reports the experiences of Buffalo State College undergraduate students who have done I-Search papers.  I was also able to access a book written by Judith Zorfass in which she details the use of I-Search papers with middle school students.  I found this information particularly interesting since it specifically deals with the special needs of young adolescents and the ways in which the I-Search paper meets those needs.  By requiring the students to be active researchers, young adolescents are engaged and kept interested.  I was also able to look at a paper Linda Jobe presented at a meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English in 1991.  Jobe expands on the I-Search paper to describe a we-search paper, which involves cooperative learning in the I-Search process.  ERIC also helped me locate a journal article from the English Journal that reviews the use of the internet in an I-Search paper.  This article was a little dated, from 1995, and in the 9 years that have passed, most students have had some exposure to the internet.  Although, in poorer or more rural areas this might not be the case.

            The next step, after completing the ERIC search was to search the Buffalo State College library’s book catalog.  I only located 1 book, but it was probably the most informative one on the subject, The I-Search Paper by Ken Macrorie.  I later learned that Macrorie was the originator of the I-Search paper.  It is also mentioned in every article and presentation I examined.

            My next step was to search the internet for information on I-Search papers.  I used the search engine Google and it led me to several internet sites describing the use of the I-Search and even some examples of I-Search papers.  I also used the links found on the English 309W syllabus website to look at the information there on I-Search papers.  One site featured an article from the Teacher Librarian journal by Carol Bowen in which she describes the use of an I-Search paper with her 5th grade class.  Google also helped me locate an example of a letter to parents one English teacher used to introduce the I-Search paper process to her students’ parents.  This was a very useful example to have to use as a model for explaining I-Search papers to parents.  I am assuming, that like me, most adults have not heard of or done an I-Search paper, so if I use one with my students, their parents should be included in the process too.  Also, since it seems like the I-Search process is very lengthy, it will consume a lot of their students’ time and I would hope most parents would want to know about the process.

 

Results

            I learned that the I-Search process is a combination of active learning and a normal research paper.  I-Search units are lengthy, typically they seem to last anywhere from 6 weeks (Bowen) to 8-12 weeks (Zorfass).  The very first thing that needs to be done is to introduce the students to the idea of an I-Search paper and how it differs from traditional research paper where they find information to answer a question assigned to them and that is it.  The I-Search paper is different, because the students get to choose their own research question and sources other than the traditional books and magazine articles are encouraged.  

In the first phase of the I-Search process, the students come up with a question they want to answer.  As Bowen (2002) wrote “the personal nature of an “I-Search” motivates students because they are searching for something they want to know.”  In order for an I-Search unit to work, the students must come up with I-Search questions that are relevant and important to them personally (Make It Happen!).   Teachers help the students brainstorm ideas for research questions, but do not assign topics or questions.  Bowen described how she used the overhead projector to help her students make an interest web in this phase.  The Make it Happen! Site, recommends that teachers have the students think about their prior knowledge of the theme, what questions they have about the theme, and what areas they are interested in learning more about.

  In many schools (especially middle schools), it appears this can be a multidisciplinary unit, covering including all disciplines (Zorfass).  The teacher(s) introduce the theme of the unit and then the students decide what specifically they are going to write about within that theme.  Zorfass states that by having the I-Search be a multidisciplinary allows every student to be “engaged in a personal search related to the theme and overarching concepts … creates a community of learners involved in seeking answers to similar, but not identical questions” (6).  An exciting benefit to this process is that students will be able to teach each other what they have learned about the theme. 

Jobe (1991) expands the I-Search to include cooperative learning in the we-search paper.  In this process, students undergo the same process as in the I-Search paper, but they work as a group.  In a We-search project, not only are the students active researchers working on a topic of personal interest and importance to them, they are required to work in a group.  Jobe (1991) found that the We-search paper benefited both teachers and students.  Her students benefited by learning work with others at the same time they were learning how to research.  The students also get to do real collaborative writing, which does not often happen.  Lastly, her students learned from each other and learned to help each other. 

Once students (either individually or in groups) have come up with a search question, the next step is for them to write down what they already know about the question, what information they want to find, and where and how they can find that information (Make It Happen!).

In the next stage, the students actually carry out their information gathering.  It is important for teachers to expand the students searching outside of the school library whenever possible (Make it Happen!).  As Davis (1995) recommends, using the internet is one way for the students to get information from a wide variety of sources.  Make it Happen! recommends getting the students to use other libraries and conducting interviews when possible.  In some communities and schools this might not be possible, but it can be attempted.  Some urban and rural schools lack the resources to help the students to make this possible.  Jobe (1991) recommends giving the students class time to work with their groups.  This would also be important for individual I-Search papers.  Some students do not have a home life that would be supportive of this kind of work, or that would make it impossible to do the work.  Therefore, by providing class time for the students to work on their projects, I would be helping students do their best.  Davis (1997) schedules one day a week during the unit for her students to work on their I-Search project.  She also encourages her students to word process their project, and her classroom has a computer that can be signed out for the students to use. 

During this stage, also called The Hunt, students should be required to keep a journal or log of what they have done, problems they encounter, etc.  Jobe recommends having her students turn in weekly reports of their individual and group’s progress.  If the students are required to turn in periodic (I think weekly is a good idea) of what progress they have made, they will be less likely to leave the project to the very end and do a poor job.   Students should understand that unlike a regular research paper where they just report what they found, in the I or We search papers, they will be reporting the process they went through.  This will give them another incentive to keep their logs or journals.  As with all the steps, it is important for the teacher to model this information for the students. 

Make it Happen! states that students should get their information from a wide range of resources, including books, magazines, newspapers, or reference texts,videos, filmstrips, or television shows, CD-ROM reference tools, interview people or conduct surveys, conduct an experiment or engage in a simulation, or go on a field trip.  I think that once students are exposed to the idea that their research does not have to be limited to the traditional sources of books in the library, they will be excited.  Who knew watching a television show or movie could be considered research! 

The teachers all recommend or require interviews as part of the process.  Davis (1997) recognizes that face-to-face interviews are the most challenging and most productive; therefore, they receive the most credit. Telephone interviews are second-best; mailed questionnaires should be used only when the first two options are impossible, or to supplement the search.”  However, I wonder if all students would be able to find someone to interview or would be comfortable doing an interview.  I think it may be best to allow students to encourage interviews, but not require them?

In the next step the students gather what information they have found answering their research question and begin the writing process, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing in some manner (Make it Happen!).  The end result does not always have to be a paper, but a paper does have to be prepared describing the process the students undertook, including their question, what they know about the questions, what they did to answer the question (the hunt) and what the results were.  Also, the paper should include a section where the students think about future questions to be answered and what is left unanswered by their search.  Make it Happen! calls this section the “What it means to me” section, where students have the opportunity to describe what they learned about research in general from the experience, and how it helped them and what they would do differently in the future. 

Bowen had her students present what they had learned in various ways, of their choosing, in addition to writing the I-Search paper.  All of her students presented what they had learned in a variety of ways including, making posters, using storyboards to create different types of books, using real objects related to their I-Search in a demonstration, creating PowerPoint presentations, making a video, and creating a photo essay.  Other possibilities could include a dialogue or skit.  All of the teacher also recommend having the students complete a self evaluation of their I-Search process.  Jobe recommends having the students complete evaluations not only of themselves, but also their groups members.  This allows the students to reflect on the unit, their project, and the group they worked in (if applicable). 

 

What’s Next

            I think the next step for myself is to try an I or We search project when I start teaching.  I will need to read some about the process, but I think it is worth learning more about and using.  It would be interesting to see if students who do I or we search papers can transition to regular research papers when they are assigned.  Does writing these papers in the first person hurt or help students write other papers?  Also, it would be interesting to know how often these projects are bring used and how many teachers are using them.  One teacher I observed at Lowry Middle School in North Tonawanda was doing a form of a we-search project with her 8th grade science class.  The students chose topics under the general topic of environmental problems and then searched for information with their group members on a specific environmental problems.  The students then presented the information they found in powerpoint presentations in front of the class.  The project was not a true we-search because the students did not present their information in the we-search form of what we know, what we learned, how we learned it, etc.  But, it did allow the students to choose their topics and use a variety of sources to find information. 


Works Cited

 

Bowen, Carol. "The I-Search with Grade 5: They Learn!." Teacher Librarian 29 (2002). 06 May 2004 <http://www.teacherlibrarian.com/tlmag/v_29/v_29_2_feature.html>.

 

Davis, Chris. "The I-Search Paper Goes Global: Using the Internet as a Research Tool." English Journal 84 (): 27-33.

 

Davis, Jean. "I-Search Paper." January 1997. Writing Research and I-Search Papers. 06 May 2004. <http://teachers.net/lessons/posts/80.html>.

 

"The I-Search Unit." 2000. Make It Happen!. Educational Development Center. 06 May 2004. <http://www.edc.org/FSC/MIH/i-search.html>.

 

Jobe, Linda. "Collaboration in the Classroom: Teaching the We-Search Paper." Annual Spring Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English. , Indianapolis. 14 March 1991.

 

Macrorie, Ken. The I-Search Paper. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook, 1988.

 

Reigstad, Tom. "I Search, You Search, We All Search for I-Search: Research Alternative Works for Advanced Writeres, Too." Composition Chronicle 10 (): 04-07.

 

Zorfass, Judith. Teaching Middle School Students to be Active Researchers. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1998.