Rubric for the I-Search Research Process
The I-Search paper must be
written in first-person narrative format.
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
|
Introduction |
Excellent
lead draws reader into paper and establishes an argumentative line (thesis). Clearly evident what the writer knew before the research
began and what he/she wanted to know about this topic. |
Good lead. Thesis is there but may be too general.
Fairly evident what the writer knew before the
research began and what he/she wanted to know about this topic. |
Weak
lead. Unclear what interested the writer about the topic. Lacks a clear
argumentative line. |
No lead. No evidence writer thought about what he/she wanted to
know about the topic. |
|
|
The Hunt |
Strong narrative format. Failures and successes in
searching described, interesting description of search. Significant review of materials. |
Narrative format.
General description of search and review of
materials included in paper. |
Attempts narrative format. Minimum possible resources reviewed, short/sketchy description of search
process. |
Little
or no independent research strategy is evident. |
|
|
Results |
Conclusion
strongly supported with examples, details, stories, and arguments
which help reader understand how writer got from beginning questions
to end results. |
Good
conclusions supported with examples, stories, etc. Further areas to explore
described. |
Conclusions
stated but not described. Statement made about further areas to explore. |
No clear evidence that writer cam up with his/her own
conclusions. No indication that student has been led to further areas of
exploration. |
|
|
What Next? |
Intelligent discussion of further questions and research. |
Notes
further research ideas. |
Shows little awareness of new questions and research. |
No evidence of awareness of further questions and
research. |
|
|
References |
Includes
at least two peer reviewed articles, two books, two internet sources, and an
interview. Follows MLA/APA guidelines and form in citation and Works
Cited page. |
May be missing a required source. Generally follows MLA/APA
guidelines and format. |
Has
made a valiant attempt to cite sources and use correct form. Missing
two or more sources, and has significant errors in form. |
Little
or no attempt made to follow style. Missing several sources, and
has significant errors in form |
|
|
Correctness |
First-person,
narrative; There are no or few errors which do not
affect the text. Includes headings. |
There
are few errors which do not affect the text
significantly. |
Several errors- some of which significantly affect the
text. |
Numerous errors affecting the text significantly. |
|