research teaching publications education links
Stephani
Foraker
Associate
Professor
forakesm AT buffalostate.edu
office
716.878.6027
Department of
Psychology
SUNY Buffalo State
1300 Elmwood
Ave.
Classroom
Bldg A309
Buffalo,
NY 14222
I am a cognitive psychologist, specializing in
psycholinguistics and memory. I am interested in how we communicate with each
other, asking how our voice, our body, and different aspects of language affect
how easily we can understand or remember something.
One of my research concentrations is based on the point
of view that memory and cognitive
processes play a significant role in language processing. Humans seem to
learn and use language effortlessly, but understanding and producing language
are complex processes that involve the interaction of domain-general and
language-specific aspects at many different levels. At present, my research
examines the sentence and discourse levels of analysis. Some of the questions
Im working on are:
·
When and how do working memory and
attention affect our understanding of words that need to be linked, but are far
apart from each other (e.g., anaphor-antecedent relations)?
·
How and when do individual differences
in working memory resources affect co-reference resolution?
·
When resolving and interpreting a
pronoun, like she, what kinds of information lead to interference vs.
facilitation?
·
Are word meanings stored and retrieved
from memory, or are they constructed on the fly from some core meaning?
A second, related branch of my research looks at the role of gestures in memory and
communication.
·
What aspects of gestures provide information
about new vs. old entities in a discourse?
·
To what extent are listener-viewers
sensitive to the information that speakers provide in gesture? Under what
circumstances do they use it?
·
What kind of information can gestures
help us encode and learn?
·
How is gestured information
represented by a producer? Spatially, propositionally, kinesically? Are the
same or different kinds of representations used by a comprehender?
To address these questions, my lab uses several
behavioral techniques including accuracy and response/reaction times,
speed-accuracy tradeoff modeling, eye-tracking measures (Eyelink 1000), and
annotation and analysis of speech and gesture recordings (audio, video).
collaborators
If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to
treat everything as if it were a nail.
- Abraham Maslow
Buffalo
State (2008-present):
Cognitive Psychology
Psycholinguistics
Research Methods in Psychology
Sensation & Perception
Long-term Memory (Senior Seminar in
Psychology)
The Psychological Power of Language
Statistics for Psychological Research
Instructor:
Research Methods,
University of Chicago, 2008
Experimental
Psychology, National-Louis University, 2008
Cognitive Development,
National-Louis University, 2007
Psychology of
Language, University of Chicago, 2004
Cognition, New York
University, 2003, 2004
The real danger is not that computers will begin to
think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers.
- Sydney J. Harris
DRAFT Introduction video
(January, 2018) - Please feel free to give me feedback on how I could improve this.
J
NOTE: Down-loading a publication represents
your agreement that it is for personal, individual use only. Please observe
copyright laws.
Brocher, A., Koenig, J.-P., Mauner, G.,
& Foraker, S. (2017, September
27). About sharing and commitment: the retrieval of biased and balanced
irregular polysemes. Language, Cognition,
and Neuroscience. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1381748 [pdf]
Brocher, A., Foraker, S., & Koenig, J.-P. (2016, April 11). Processing of
irregular polysemes in sentence reading. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000271 [pdf available on request]
Foraker, S., &
Murphy, G. L. (2012). Polysemy in sentence comprehenion: Effects of meaning
dominance. Journal of Memory and
Language. [pdf]
Foraker, S. &
McElree, B. (2011). Comprehension of linguistic dependencies: Speed-accuracy
tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(11), 764-783. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00313.x [pdf]
Foraker, S.
(2011). Gesture and discourse: How we use our hands to introduce and refer
back. In G. Stam, M. Ishino, & R. Ashley (Eds.), Integrating Gestures. New York, NY: John Benjamins. [pdf available upon request]
Nusbaum H.,
Foraker, S., & Fenn, K. (2010).
Working memory and language processing. In P. C. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language
Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Foraker, S.,
Regier, T., Khetarpal, N., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Indirect
evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one. Cognitive Science, 33, 287-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01014.x [pdf]
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007).
The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive
representations. Journal of Memory and
Language, 56, 357-383. [pdf]
Foraker, S. (2004). The mechanisms
involved in the prominence of referent representations during pronoun
coreference. ProQuest
Dissertations.
Foraker, S. (2003). The processing of
logophoric reflexives shows discourse and locality constraints. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic
Society: Parasessions, 2003. [pdf]
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory
structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and
Language, 48, 67-91. [pdf]
* denotes an undergraduate student co-author
Foraker, S. (2016,
July). Visual-spatial working memory resources modulate multi-modal
comprehension. 7th Conference of the International Society for
Gesture Studies, Paris, France.
Foraker, S., &
*Wight, B. (2013, March). Going the distance: Pronoun resolution relies on direct-access
retrieval from memory. CUNY Human Sentence Processing conference, Columbia, SC.
Brocher,
A., Koenig, J.-P., Foraker, S.,
& Mauner, G. (2012, October). The retrieval and mental representation of
biased and balanced irregular polysemes: Evidence from priming and
eye-fixations. 8th International Conference on The Mental Lexicon,
Montreal, Canada.
Foraker, S., &
*Delo, M. (2012, March). Talk to the hand: Gestures aid in comprehension of
ambiguous pronouns. Eastern Psychological Association conference, Pittsburgh,
PA.
Foraker, S., &
*Ostrov, M. (2011, March). When words are not enough: Does gesturing facilitate
learning more than imagery? Eastern Psychological Association conference,
Cambridge, MA.
Foraker, S., &
*Rivers, M. V. (2010, July). Students reflect level of understanding through
non-verbal backchanneling. 4th Conference of the International
Society for Gesture Studies, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany.
Foraker, S. (2008,
May). Memory search in language comprehension: Semantic and grammatical constraints
on pronoun interpretation. 80th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern
Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Foraker, S.,
Regier, T., Khetarpal, N., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. (2007, August).
Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one. 20th Annual Conference
of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN.
Foraker, S., &
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007, June). Gesture and discourse: How we use our hands to
refer back. 3rd International Society for Gesture Studies Conference:
Integrating Gestures, Chicago, IL.
Foraker, S.,
Nusbaum, H., & *Schoeneman, S. (2007, May). Re-accessing representations:
Prominent concepts show greater specificity of meaning. Midwestern
Psychological Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
Foraker, S.,
Nusbaum, H., & *Schoeneman, S. (2007, March). Re-accessing representations:
Specificity of meaning for prominent and non-prominent concepts. CUNY Human
Sentence Processing Conference, La Jolla, CA.
Foraker, S. (2003,
April). The processing of logophoric reflexives shows discourse and locality
constraints. Chicago Linguistic Society conference, Chicago, IL.
McElree, B.
& Foraker, S. (2000, September).
Co-occurrence frequency and plausibility constraints do not directly affect the
time-course of parsing operations. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language
Processing conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kalinowski,
L. & Foraker, S. (2016, March).
Speech perception & working memory: more than what meets the ear. Annual
Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
Zak, S.,
Crimmen, C., Franz, T., Kalinowski, L., Brunetto, M., Holenstein, S., & Foraker, S. (2016, March). Warm
memories: the impact of color variation on recognition of distractor images.
Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
Roland, D.,
Hirose, Y., Mauner, G., & Foraker,
S. (2015, September). Reversal in reading times for pronominal relative
clauses: difference in expectations or spillover? Architectures and Mechanisms
of Language Processing conference, Msida, Malta.
Roland, D.,
Hirose, Y., Mauner, G., & Foraker,
S. (2015, March). Expectations and pronominal relative clauses: eye movement
data vs. self-paced reading. CUNY Human Sentence Processing conference, Los
Angeles, CA.
*Bellman,
D., & Foraker, S. (2015, March).
Lending a helping hand: Individual differences modulate how gesture facilitates
working memory. Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,
Philadelphia, PA.
*Kalinowski,
L., *Syed, A., *Yuhnke, K., *Wekenmann, C., & Foraker, S. (2015, March). Audio-visual input helps understanding
of phonologically and structurally difficult sentences. Annual Meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Foraker, S. (2014,
November). Visual-spatial and verbal working memory resources modulate
multi-modal co-reference. 55th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic
Society, Long Beach, CA. [pdf]
Roland, D.,
Hirose, Y., Mauner, G., & Foraker,
S. (2014, September). Eye movements during the processing of pronominal
relative clauses. Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing
conference, Edinburgh, UK.
Foraker, S., &
*Kuhl, C. (2014, July). Intentional gesturing at encoding facilitates retrieval,
but not as much as mental imagery: Implications for representation of gestured
information. 6th Conference of the International Society for Gesture
Studies, San Diego, CA. [pdf]
Foraker, S. (2014,
March). Gestures modulate access to referent representations. CUNY Human
Sentence Processing conference, Columbus, OH. [pdf]
Foraker, S., &
*Kuhl, C. (2013, November). Gesturing intentionally during encoding: Effects of
fluid intelligence and spontaneous gesture rate. 54th Annual Meeting
of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Foraker, S., &
*Delo, M. (2013, March). Listen to the hand: Gestures shape the comprehension
of ambiguous pronouns. CUNY Human Sentence Processing conference, Columbia, SC.
*Granieri,
M., *Wekenmann, C., *Miller, C., *Bechtold, T., *Grove, A., *Cosenza, L.,
Foraker, S. (2013, March). Change
blindness at the movies. Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,
New York, NY.
Brocher,
A., Koenig, J.-P., Foraker, S.,
Mauner, G., & Buckley, K. (2012, September). Retrieval of irregular
polysemes: Evidence from priming, eye-fixations, and evoked potentials.
Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing conference, Riva Del
Garda, Italy.
*Kuhl, C.,
& Foraker, S. (2012, May). Are
we smarter with our hands? Relations between gesturing and fluid intelligence.
24th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science,
Chicago, IL.
Brocher,
A., Foraker, S., Koenig, J.-P.,
& Mauner, G. (2012, March). Retrieval of irregular polysemes: Evidence from
priming and eye-movements. CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, New York,
NY. [pdf]
Foraker, S. (2011,
November). Intentional gesturing during encoding enhances retrieval. 52nd
annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.
*Rivers, M.
V., & Foraker, S. (2010, March).
Do students reflect their level of understanding through non-verbal behaviors?
Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Brooklyn, NY. [pdf]
Foraker, S., & Murphy, G. L. (2009, March). Polysemy in sentence
comprehension: Effects of meaning dominance. CUNY Sentence Processing
Conference, Davis, CA.
Foraker, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007, August). Gesture and discourse: How
we use our hands to refer back. 20th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN.
Foraker, S. (2007, March). Explicit versus implicit prosody: Effects on pronoun
interpretation. CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, La Jolla, CA.
Foraker, S. & McElree, B. (2006, March). The role of prominence in pronoun
resolution: Availability versus accessibility. CUNY Sentence Processing
Conference, New York, USA.
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2005, March). On the memory structures
underlying prominence during coreference resolution. CUNY Sentence Processing
Conference, Tucson, AZ.
Bencini, G., McElree, B., & Foraker,
S. (2004, September). The effect of animacy on the time course of filler-gap
resolution in Wh- Questions. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language
Processing Conference, Aix, France.
Foraker, S. (2004, March). Syntactic focus and first-mention status affect pronoun
coreference. CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, College Park, MD.
Foraker, S. & McElree, B. (2001,
March). The effects of co-occurrence frequency on the time-course of parsing
operations. CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Philadelphia,
PA.
Ph.D.,
2004. Experimental Psychology,
New York University, NY
M.A.,
2001. Experimental Psychology, New York University, NY
B.A.,
1998. Psychology, University of Akron, OH
Last revised:
January, 2016.